Recording Bass: Mics vs. DI

jamesnotjim's picture

Teaser/Abstract:
There are two ways to get your bass into your computer or other recording device. You can choose Direct Input (DI) or use a microphone. This brief article discusses both approaches.

Body:
I've spent a little time in studios and have done a bit of recording on my own. For a long time, I was convinced the best way to get a good bass sound was never to route the signal from the pickups directly to the recording console. I had always heard that the direct input method (DI) was the way to go. But lately, I've had a change of heart. I find that I get the best, most life-like bass sounds by recording my bass just like a most electric guitarists record their guitars: by micing the cab.
Direct Input
The conventional wisdom about recording electric bass has long been to "go direct." A direct setup looks like this:

The advantage of DI is that the signal never passes through the open air. It moves from the pickups, through the direct box, to the mixing console. Assuming you have quiet pickups, you can minimize noise and eliminate cross talk between the bass and any other instruments or ambient sounds. The direct box is a necessary intermediary since the signal level coming off the pickups, even on an active bass, is quite low. The DI brings the "instrument level" signal up to "line level," which is what the mixing board wants. Using the direct box to raise the signal minimizes the amount of preamplification that is necessary, which in turn reduces noise (having to add a lot of gain at the pre-amp stage to correct a low incoming signal is a sure formula for adding noise to your track).
Micing the Cab
DI works, there's no doubt about that. But what if your bass isn't particularly quiet? What if it doesn't sound amazing right off the pickups. What if you use your amp to color your sound? If any of these considerations apply, then you might want to do as the guitarists do and put a mic on your cab. After all, if you've spent money on a decent amp and a decent cab and have spent years dialing in your live sound, why not use that as a basis for your recorded sound? Here's what a mic setup looks like:

The advantage of using a mic is that you get, with minimal effort, the sound that you hear off the cab itself. While expensive mics with really wide dynamic ranges can capture every nuance, you'd probably be surprised how good even something as commonplace as an SM57 sounds. A mic is practically the only way to go if you use guitar-style effects like distortion, as distortion-based effects tend to sound terrible when recorded direct to the console (since distortion relies on the speaker to help create the distorted or over-driven sound).
There are drawbacks, of course. You have to experiment a bit with mic placement (I prefer it close up to the speaker, just a bit off axis but still aimed, more or less, at the center of the speaker). The same mic that pics up your bass can also pick up other sounds in the room, including such undesirable sounds as your air conditioner or cell phone. If you're recording more than one instrument at a time, you're likely to have some of the other instruments, especially drums, bleed into your bass mic.
Computer-based Recording/Digital Audio Workstations (DAWs)
If you use your computer as a platform for home recording and you're just recording one track at a time, you can do without a mixing console. But you will need a pre-amp or audio interface of some sort. These boxes come in several varieties. Some are plug into your USB2 or FireWire ports. Some plug directly into the microphone port on your laptop or desktop sound card. Some are cards that replace your desktop sound card. A few install in an extra front bay on your desktop PC. Audio interfaces/preamp range in price from a little less than $100 to several hundred dollars depending mostly upon the number of inputs they provide.
Be sure not to confuse audio interfaces with MIDI interfaces. Some boxes function with both types of input. In general, if you're trying to record live sounds, including guitars, basses, and vocals, you'll need an audio interface. If you're exclusively recording MIDI-capable keyboard performances, you'll need a MIDI interface.
How do you know what's best?
Recording is an art and a science. The only way to really tell what works for you is to experiment. Your recording style will change over time, just as your playing style has. You'll throw out old techniques in favor of new ones. You'll learn from trial and error and from books and other recordists. As with playing, let your ears be your guide. If you can get the sound you like, it doesn't really matter how you get it. The only thing that really matters is the sound of the final product.

Comments

Recording bass: Mics vs DI

I am old school, and have always believed that using a microphone is the only way to go. Until I purchased my Line6 BassPod XT Live, that is. Why? Because it can simulate any amp/head/effects combination, and provide a digital output to a USB port. Works really well. But the same principle applies. Your bass sound is coloured exactly the way you want it.

wheat's picture

I'll have to check one out...

I'll have to check one of those out, Paul. I tried one a long time ago, when they first came out, but I didn't give it a fair shake. It would be nice to be able to record in the middle of the night, when the wife is sleeping and such. Thanks for the tip.

Wheat

bassplaying.com

bassplaying.com

Recording in middle of night

Hey Wheat, you will not be disappointed. Steep learning curve, and there were one or two days when I thought I wasted a lot of money. Then suddenly, I found combinations that worked with my TRB6P, and the rest is history. Can't comment about the Bosses, as I have not used them.

Regards

Paul

wheat's picture

Just a quick note

Just a quick note (especially for those who find this page via search engines) that, while I feel putting a mic on a bass cab is still a valid and useful approach, I've come around to PaulV's way of thinking as far as my home recording goes.

I now use a Line6 TonePort UX2 (see my review of it). The amp/cab/mic simulations let me dial in the same sound I used to get from my amp/cab while keeping the signal path nice and clean. GearBox, the software that runs the UX2 (and the other interfaces in the TonePort line) has a hum eliminator feature that fixes the noise issues with my old passive stock Fender pickups (so long as I'm careful not to aim my pickups at my laptop monitor, which still creates some hum).

Check out the TonePorts. I've gotten a lot of use out mine. If it died tomorrow, I'd order another one in a heartbeat.

Wheat

bassplaying.com

BoH's picture

Boss GT-8

I'm wondering if the Boss GT-8 or GT-6B wouldn't be as nice too. Any thoughts?


Low B, or not low B? That is the question!

Bo


You don't love me, you just love my FINGERSTYLE!
Peavey T40; SX/Squier P-bass; Spector Legend 5
Roland Bass 30 Cube

Mics vs. DI

Hey Wheat,

I agree. For a long time I thought recording direct was the best way to go to get the true sound of my bass recorded, but these days I lean towards a miked cab.

Sometimes direct is okay for me, especially if whoever is producing insists on recording one or two tracks at a time. This generally results in a very stilted, mechanical recording, however, and one in which I am concentrating on just getting the notes right, rather than adding any real feel or style.

However, during the last few years I have been fortunate enough to have been involved in a few recording projects where the bulk of the music has been recorded "live." This allows me to relax and begin to groove, and if I am plugged in direct, I have found there is often a certain "whackety-clackety" aspect to my tracks that is not a good thing at all. Run the bass through a miked cabinet, though, and all the bad stuff goes away.

So these days, I will almost always record with a miked cab, and a pox on all fascist producers!

Kelly

There is no substitute for proper technique!

Dave Magaro's picture

I've used both. A lot of

I've used both. A lot of times I will mic the cab and combine it with a D.I. Lately, though I've been leaning towards micing the cab. The last few recordings I did I just used a Senn 421 on the cab and it sounded great.

Dave

Yea most of the studios I've

Yea most of the studios I've done work for use both.
That way they have the clarity from the XLR as well as the raw sound from the cab through a mic to get all those extra finger noises and hissing and stuff that can make it sound real.

(Not bass related)
I found a really cool online game this week, heaps of fun.
http://darkside-mafia.com/login.php

Fart stain AKA Jaymie